Rate Post Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_oleson
Tinkerer
Username: Rick_oleson

Post Number: 554
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Monday, April 07, 2008 - 07:28 pm:   

Dust specks generally won't have a measurable effect on photos unless they're just horrendous: the effect of a speck of dust is usually to absorb the light that hits it, preventing that ray of light from reaching the film.... so it becomes a function of the percentage of the lens area that's blocked by the dust specks, probably a small fraction of a percent.

Scratches, and particularly cleaning marks, are another story: they cover a much larger area of the surface than dust specks do, and rather than absorbing light they scatter it. The scattered light bounces around inside the lens and does reach the film, but not in the locations where it's supposed to. Its effect is generally to reduce contrast by scattering light into areas of the picture that are supposed to be dark.

And, if the performance of that Perfex 55's lens was similar to mine, a bullet hole probably wouldn't make it that much worse.....

: ) =

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration