Rate Post Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David_nebenzahl
Tinkerer
Username: David_nebenzahl

Post Number: 241
Registered: 12-2009

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Wednesday, March 31, 2010 - 06:46 pm:   

It's not clear that you're doing things in the right order here, at least so far as I can tell. (Disclaimer: I'm not familiar with this camera at all.) My apologies if I'm missing something here.

The usual course of focus correction for a rangefinder camera is in two steps: first the actual focus is corrected, then the rangefinder is adjusted.

It sounds like you're saying that the actual focus of the lens is off, correct? In that case, the first step is to get the lens focusing correctly. This is done by adjusting the focus at infinity, and can be done with a collimator (in the form of a 2nd camera) as you described. So far, so good.

Except that you shouldn't be messing with either lens element, screwing them in or out or shimming them, assuming that they were correctly placed in the shutter (of course, that's an assumption you can't always make, but it's a starting point). Both elements should be completely screwed in, with whatever original shims were there, if any. You then adjust the focus by moving the focus ring/collar/sleeve/whatever means is used to focus the lens (this is a manual focus camera, correct?) where it is secured to the focus helical. Forget about the distance scale for the moment: you just want to get the lens focused at infinity (at the film plane) when the ring/collar/whatever is rotated all the way towards infinity.

After the focus is corrected, then you can adjust the rangefinder (also at infinity).

So far as the scale being off, that remains to be seen until you're sure the focus is correct. At that point, the scale should be fairly accurate; the discrepancy you reported (showing 2.85m when actually focused at 3m would not be correct, unless the scale was incorrectly printed or engraved, which would be surprising.)

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration