Rate Post Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Adrian
Tinkerer
Username: Adrian

Post Number: 312
Registered: 08-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 09:27 am:   

Ah - got it, I think - so 32=22, 64=32, 128=45 or thereabouts. Anyway, the DoF should be quite something.

There are various websites with pictures of how to make your obsolete camera take 120 - I think it's a case of google old film sizes, eg 116, and get creative with searching the results. I think you will probably need to sacrifice a roll of film and mark the numbers on the paper for 122 yourself, then respool films under that paper. A pain, but probably not much worse than rolling your own 620 once you've done it a couple of times.

Anyway, to give you some inspiration, this is what those old Kodaks are capable of - no fancy lens on mine that I can see, and just the standard shutter with three speeds and three stops.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/gray1720/sets/72157622746026547/

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration