Rate Post Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

charlie

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 09:24 am:   

My ranking of importance would be optical quality first, shutter speed second, and lose the built in exposure meter. Any camera that depends on built in electronics will not last long enough to be worth the inveztment. Others here may differ.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration