Rate Post Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ismaelg
Tinkerer
Username: Ismaelg

Post Number: 36
Registered: 11-2009

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Thursday, January 21, 2010 - 08:25 pm:   

Wait, before you chase me off let me explain! :-)
I like to restore and preserve otherwise useless cameras, just for the fun of it and for display. I am sure I am not the only one here doing that. Just like 110 says 1970's, I think the Kodak Disc says 1980's like no other. Yes, image quality sucks, especially with such a tiny little negative, but they are part of history.
I just indulged myself spending the whopping amount of 99 cents for 3 of these cameras. I wonder if there is any serviceability info, as not even the batteries can be replaced in one of them. If I can get the flash and shutter to fire only once I'll be very happy and call it quits. :-)
Yes, I can probably get a still brand new one in box for about the same money, but what fun would that be?

Thanks,
Ismael

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration