Rate Post Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Paul_ron
Tinkerer
Username: Paul_ron

Post Number: 305
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Friday, September 07, 2012 - 04:53 pm:   

That second article was great. Thanks. I'm sure that will clear up alot for many people.

I personally have leared to compensate my meter for the difference in using newer batteries by calibrating my exposures to my developing technique to my printing so my results are consistant and predictable each time I take readings with my meter.

For all I care I can use a VOM with a CDS cell to measure the light as long as I know exactly what the outcome is going to be in my print.

So "accurate" and "precise" are relative, not an absolute as you will find from meter to meter; your results will vary.

.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration