| Author |
Message |
    
Martyr
Tinkerer
Username: Martyr
Post Number: 1
Registered: 08-2008
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, August 04, 2008 - 02:29 pm: | 
|
It's developed some oily aperture blades and I'm considering cracking it open to see if I can make the save.
It's the version with the aperture ring out near the front of the lens. Anyone on here taken one of these apart? Got any tips or advice?
Thanks! |
Mndean
Tinkerer
Username: Mndean
Post Number: 63
Registered: 08-2007
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Monday, August 04, 2008 - 11:44 pm: |
|
Is it an MC Rokkor or an Auto Rokkor? I doubt it makes a difference, but it's best to be specific about these things. |
Martyr
Tinkerer
Username: Martyr
Post Number: 2
Registered: 08-2008
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Tuesday, August 05, 2008 - 05:42 am: |
|
The end of the lens says "MC TELE ROKKOR PF 135mm f/2.8" |
Mndean
Tinkerer
Username: Mndean
Post Number: 64
Registered: 08-2007
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Wednesday, August 06, 2008 - 09:47 am: |
|
Thanks, that tells me something. I'll see if there's a site that describes the dismantling of the lens. I've only done two 135/2.8 Minolta lenses, a 5/4 MC Celtic and a 4/4 MD Rokkor-X, neither like your older Rokkor. |
Gez
Tinkerer
Username: Gez
Post Number: 34
Registered: 09-2007
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Saturday, August 09, 2008 - 05:48 pm: |
|
Mndean, have you any info on opening a MC Rokkor 35mm/2.8?? |
Mndean
Tinkerer
Username: Mndean
Post Number: 66
Registered: 08-2007
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!) | | Posted on Sunday, August 10, 2008 - 07:53 pm: |
|
Sorry, I haven't. I've only done the 135/2.8s listed above and the 58/1.4 lens. I have read about the 35/2.8 somewhere, but I didn't pay attention as I don't even have one. |
