Author |
Message |
_nathan
Tinkerer Username: _nathan
Post Number: 7 Registered: 04-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 05:55 pm: |
|
Hello. I recently acquired a Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 1:4/13,5cm T lens, however I am unable to identify the mount. Please forgive my subpar photograph - my 2 megapixel camera has no depth of field control. Any help would greatly be appreciated. |
Glenn
Tinkerer Username: Glenn
Post Number: 351 Registered: 07-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, May 16, 2008 - 02:44 pm: |
|
Diameter of threads? |
_nathan
Tinkerer Username: _nathan
Post Number: 8 Registered: 04-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 10:17 am: |
|
Approximately 38-39mm... |
_nathan
Tinkerer Username: _nathan
Post Number: 9 Registered: 04-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 10:31 am: |
|
I searched completed fleabay auctions for similiar items... I found this: http://cgi.ebay.com/Carl-Zeiss-f-Leica-Screw-Mount-4-13-5cm-Triotar-couple_W0QQi temZ350058517397QQihZ022QQcategoryZ30063QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem The serial number on my lens is only 205 removed from the one on fleabay. So I am guessing it is the above lens... |
Dgillette4
Tinkerer Username: Dgillette4
Post Number: 206 Registered: 04-2007
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 11:38 am: |
|
Lookks like a leica threaded mount. Many after market lenses made for Leica, Zeiss, Culminar etc. don |
_nathan
Tinkerer Username: _nathan
Post Number: 10 Registered: 04-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, May 19, 2008 - 02:18 pm: |
|
So now that the mystery is solved... is this lens really 'rare' and worth upwards of a couple hundred dollars? For some reason, I find it hard to believe that the aforementioned seller was asking so much for this lens... |
Glenn
Tinkerer Username: Glenn
Post Number: 353 Registered: 07-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, May 19, 2008 - 02:56 pm: |
|
This seller is always very pricey, but the items always seem to be in very good condition - both cosmetically and optically. Whether these properties, make the lens worth approx £600+VAT in the UK is another matter entirely! |
Dgillette4
Tinkerer Username: Dgillette4
Post Number: 208 Registered: 04-2007
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 12:05 pm: |
|
I would feel better using a Tessar or Sonnar and the price seems rediculous. I used a Triotar on an old rollie and found it very soft I have a colinar135 , it weighs a ton, all machined of brass. It may give a fair result but at what cost. I paid $30 American for it. |
Leesobing
Tinkerer Username: Leesobing
Post Number: 23 Registered: 01-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, March 29, 2009 - 06:06 am: |
|
it may be L39 before M3 you can using adpotping ring to M42 and adpotping other mount. PRAKTICA in before WW2 have produce some screw mount but 40mm.after WW2 contax s and it changM42 mount. |
Glenn
Tinkerer Username: Glenn
Post Number: 537 Registered: 07-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, March 30, 2009 - 04:40 pm: |
|
The correct terminology for the lens in question is LTM, the thread pitch is imperial (inch). The L39 mount is a different beast altogether, both diameter and pitch being metric. In many cases you find that L39 lenses will screw into a Leica body; however, you do find examples where machining tolerances work against this and the fit will be very tight. Adapting a LTM lens to M42 is a pretty useless exercise - no infinity focus and in most cases poor 'macro' capability. A reversed standard lens and extension rings will give far better magnification and coverage |
Leesobing
Tinkerer Username: Leesobing
Post Number: 25 Registered: 01-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 11:32 pm: |
|
CAN you SHOW more PICTURE?? |