Who are we?  Featured Cameras  Articles  Instruction Manuals  Repair Manuals  The Classic Camera Repair Forum  Books  View/Sign Guestbook

Canonet QL17 CdS : possible to find a... Log in | Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classic Camera Repair » Archives-2008 » Canonet QL17 CdS : possible to find an alternative component? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Poum
Tinkerer
Username: Poum

Post Number: 7
Registered: 09-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 08:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hello,

I have a QL17 (not New, not GIII) with a dead CdS component. I find no reference to change it, does anybody know what generic cell can I buy at my local electronics store?

Regards,

Guillaume
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wernerjb
Tinkerer
Username: Wernerjb

Post Number: 273
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 08:33 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I am not sure whether this applies to your Canonet model, but I guess that if it is not too different from other cameras of the same vintage, newer cells can be used, but it is a matter of dimensions, mounting facility AND electrical suitability (zero to several K-ohms); you have to ask for LDRs instead of CdS cells.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Poum
Tinkerer
Username: Poum

Post Number: 8
Registered: 09-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 09:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Yes I'm mainly wondering about what you call electrical suitability. All photoresistors do not have the same range and as mine is out of order I cannot measure its resistance from total dark (should be infinite) to sunshine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Charlie
Tinkerer
Username: Charlie

Post Number: 142
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 10:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Probably from a Canonet 28. This camera had a slightly wider range of exposure than the QL17GIII. (EV3-EV17 vs EV3.5-EV17 for the GIII, according to the Canon camera museum) but it should be close enough.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wernerjb
Tinkerer
Username: Wernerjb

Post Number: 275
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 12:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Poum, there are not many ways to get an identical replacement cell. You can only salvage one from a donor Canonet or, as an alternative, find one (as I said zero resistance in full light, 5-6 kohms approx. in complete darkness). You will, of course, have to align that one with a variable resistor (I am pretty sure there is at least one one in the light meter circuitry).

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration