Author |
Message |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
Machineboy
Tinkerer Username: Machineboy
Post Number: 19 Registered: 01-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, February 29, 2008 - 12:10 pm: |
|
Hi guys, just got a nice Sekonic light meter, model L-248 that didn't work. After some fiddling on the inside of the metering mechanism, I realized that the battery test switch was always on, making the meter really "hot" ie. spiking at all times. After loosening a screw the needle fell back to normal position, and now the meter reacts very nicely to light. The problem is that when I compare it to the light meter in my digital Canon G9, the meter underexposes at about -2 stops. Is there a way to recalibrate the meter? |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
Machineboy
Tinkerer Username: Machineboy
Post Number: 20 Registered: 01-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, February 29, 2008 - 12:33 pm: |
|
I think I found the answer myself. There is a small adjustment screw just to the left and down from the light sensor. Turning it clockwise lowers the sensitivity. It only went down about 1 stop, so there isn't that much leverage. Still, I think the meter is more accurate now. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
John_shriver
Tinkerer Username: John_shriver
Post Number: 24 Registered: 12-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, March 29, 2008 - 08:14 pm: |
|
If you used a modern 625 alkaline cell, that's why the meter is two stops off. It is designed for a mercury battery, which has been banned world-wide. You could use a Wein zinc-air cell. Alternately, a 675 zinc-air hearing aid battery from the drug store, with an o-ring for spacing and a washer for shimming. Or, have a Schottky diode added to the circuit to drop the voltage, and use a silver-oxide 625 cell. |
|