data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
Haig Hovaness
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 - 03:52 pm: |
|
The Nikon EM is a delightfully designed camera, but the prism is inferior to that of other Nikons, with reduced brightness and frequent centerline distortion related to poorly applied reflective coating. My question is: do the prisms in the FE, FM, FE2, FM2 cameras have the same dimensions as the EM prism so that they could be swapped in? |