Author |
Message |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
Steve
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, October 03, 2004 - 09:37 pm: |
|
Tell me if I'm right... In theory, if I use the "sunny 16" rule, I am thinking that a gray card placed in the sun and read at F16 at the proper shutter speed, say, 1/250 sec using ASA 200 film, I could calibrate my meter by adjusting the ASA setting on the camera until the meter reads for a proper exposure. Does this sound reasonable? Usually, if I set the ASA for the speed of the film and expose the way the meter tells me, the pictures are a little underexposed but with considerable loss of detail in the shadows. Opening up another stop or two usually corrects it. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
Jackson
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, October 04, 2004 - 05:26 pm: |
|
The intensity of sunlight varies from one geographic area to the next, but the gray card should get you close. What happens if you simply shoot a few frames outdoors manually, using Sunny 16 rules, without regard for the meter? Are the shots still underexposed? Are you shooting negs or slides? |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54095/540953f4d0e3d05161ea07d9319c0dac4f55e56b" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03a0/e03a0331affec859e85e62c8b837e27f78f167a9" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0d5/9a0d5082734650c73c90e16b009d64f4f5ac1f20" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9262f/9262f8c58bbd2f0c2280d504257c3aba19607868" alt="Link to this message"
Steve
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, October 04, 2004 - 06:20 pm: |
|
Sometimes, but I usually overexpose from what the meter says on purpose a bit, since the first roll of film appeared underexposed. I also bracket some, if it's for an imprtant pic. |
|